Own what you build: what the Ashfords IP morning taught us about brand, protection and commercial value
Brand is not a logo. It is what your business is worth. And most founders only discover that when it is too late to build it properly.
That was the thread running through a joint FinTech West and Ashfords event held recently at Ashfords' Bristol office. A fireside discussion, a legal briefing from Ashfords' IP team and a hands-on workshop using a fictional fintech case study combined to make one argument: brand and IP protection are not sequential. They are two sides of the same commercial decision.
Here is what the room learned.
Brand does commercial work before the pitch deck is open
Investors are looking founders up before any conversation starts. Partners are forming a view before due diligence begins. Enterprise clients are assessing risk before a procurement process opens. That is brand doing the work, and it is either working for you or against you.
At Moneyhub, where FinTech West's CMO Ingrid Anusic led marketing, brand and mission were inseparable. The company's purpose, improving the financial wellness of people, was not a tagline. It was the commercial proposition in every investor, partner and client conversation.
"The brand gave us permission to be in rooms we had no right to be in as a company of our size," Anusic said. While revenue and budget were still small, the business won 17 industry awards in three years. Not vanity. A deliberate strategy to build third-party credibility with enterprise buyers who needed evidence before they would open a door, over often a 12 to 18 month sales cycle.
The lesson for founders:
Brand is doing the work before your product gets a chance to
Narrative and story are not marketing extras, they are what makes the product make sense to someone who has never used it
Awards, thought leadership and external validation compound over time and create the multiple touchpoints that B2B sales cycles require
Brand building does not pause during a fundraise. Pipeline and revenue growth must continue in parallel, both to demonstrate commercial momentum and because the deal is never guaranteed until it is signed
What a brand is actually worth, and what happens when you find out
Liz Richards, COO at FinTech West, has been on both sides of acquisitions at Thomson Reuters and Credit Suisse. Her view: what acquirers are often really buying is the people, the trust and the reputation that surrounds the technology.
At Thomson Reuters, one acquisition fell apart entirely during due diligence. The target company had assumed its trademark covered a particular geography. It did not. That geography was central to the acquirer's growth strategy. The deal collapsed.
At Credit Suisse, Richards lived through the opposite: a brand that had accrued decades of trust, to the point where walking into a room and saying "I'm from Credit Suisse" was enough to open almost any door. Then, during the crisis that preceded the UBS acquisition, that trust evaporated faster than it had been built.
"Once it starts to disappear, it can be a very quick and rapid decline," she said. "The finance team love to have brand on their balance sheet. They can't bear it when it disappears."
The practical implications for founders going into investment or acquisition:
Be transparent early about what you own and where, including which geographies are and are not covered by your trademark
Keep the business running during a fundraise or deal process. Founders who take their eye off commercial delivery often pay for it when the deal requires evidence of continued growth
Understand that the acquirer's brand strategy will determine whether yours survives, and that is a commercial decision, not a sentimental one
What it takes to build a brand that survives due diligence
At Creditcall, Anusic faced a different challenge. A strong product with a loyal market, but a brand that had not kept pace with where the business needed to go. The founders knew early that their acquirer would come from the US. That shaped everything.
The repositioning that followed delivered 300% lead growth and 30% revenue growth. But the brand work went beyond visual identity. It meant thought leadership, physical presence in the US market and consistent positioning across every channel. Critically, marketing was embedded in business strategy, not running alongside it. Commercial credibility, demonstrated through pipeline and revenue growth, and brand visibility went hand in hand throughout.
After the acquisition by NMI, Anusic led the integration of two brands across the UK and US within six months. That, she said, is not a rebrand project. It is a commercial and cultural exercise that only holds if the brand was built with real substance underneath it.
The legal foundations most founders skip
The logo, the name, the mark: these are not the brand. Brand is the perception your business builds through everything it does, how it behaves, how it delivers, how it shows up. The logo and the mark are what carry that perception. Protect the carrier and you protect the signal that points to everything you have built. Understanding that distinction is also what makes legal protection necessary.
Chris Fotheringham, Associate at Ashfords and the firm's IP specialist for the session, set out the legal picture clearly.
Copyright protects creative works, including software co de, automatically and without registration. Trademark protects a brand, but only once it is actively registered. The two are frequently confused, and that confusion is expensive.
The most common mistake Fotheringham sees: founders leave trademark registration until an investor's due diligence forces the question. By then, someone else may already have prior rights.
A practical checklist for any founder building a brand:
Choose something distinctive. Descriptive names cannot be registered because they simply describe what the business does
Clear the brand before committing to it, searching trademark registries not just Companies House
Secure domain names and social handles early, across every market you might enter. Domains are contractual rights, not IP, but squatters are real and recovery is costly. Treat them as part of the same protection exercise.
Register trademarks in every jurisdiction you plan to trade in. A UK mark gives you no protection in the EU or the US
Make sure the company owns the software, not the founders personally. Under UK law, copyright sits with whoever created the work unless a contract explicitly assigns it to the company. Payment alone does not transfer ownership. This applies to employees, freelancers, agencies and co-founders equally
Document IP ownership in every contract from day one
Apple was the standout example in the room. Cited as one of the world's most valuable brands, it is a business that can borrow against its brand value, a level of commercial utility that only exists because the brand was built with discipline and protected consistently.
Michael Jordan, by contrast, reportedly had to pay around $200,000 to use his own name in China after someone else registered it first. Trademark squatting is common in markets with complex registration systems, and it is often cheaper to pay than to fight.
What the workshop made real
The FlowPay exercise walked the room through IP decisions at each growth stage, from pre-launch through to international expansion, using a fictional mobile-first fintech as the case study.
The recurring theme across all four stages: founders assume things are protected that are not, and the gap between assumption and documentation is where value is lost.
Key questions every founder should be able to answer:
Does the company own the software, or do the founders personally?
Have co-founders signed formal IP assignment agreements?
Who owns the code if it was built by a contractor with no written contract?
What are the terms of service of every AI tool used in product development?
Are open-source components documented, and do any prohibit commercial use?
The risk nobody had thought about
One attendee shared a follow-up insight from their own research: under English law, the doctrine of bona vacantia, meaning ownerless goods, means IP passes to the Crown if there is no clear owner.
This applies if a founder dies without a will that explicitly names their IP assets, or if a company is dissolved without formally transferring its IP out first. For most individuals the family inheritance rules provide a safety net. For founders, the real risks are more specific: a will silent on IP, a company wound down without first transferring assets, a co-founder agreement that does not address what happens if one of them dies.
Takeaway: name your IP assets in your will. Check what your company structure says about what happens if a co-founder exits or dies. Get it in writing before you need it.
What founders are actually protecting
There is a principle in marketing that goes back through Kotler, Aaker and Ries and Trout: brand is not something you own. It is how your business is perceived through everything it does. Not how it looks. What it does. How it behaves with customers, staff, partners and competitors. You control the inputs. You do not control what people conclude from them.
So when a founder says they need to protect their brand, what they are really saying is they need to protect the signals that carry their reputation. The name, the mark, the visual identity are not the brand itself. They are the shorthand that points to it. Protect those, and you protect access to the trust you have spent years building.
Building the perception is the founder's job. Protecting the signals that carry it is legal work. The morning made the case that both matter, and neither works without the other.
Get involved
FinTech West works closely with founders, investors, advisers and ecosystem partners across the South West to create the connections and conversations that support growth.
If you are building a brand, navigating a funding round or thinking about what protection you need before a partnership or acquisition, we would like to hear from you. Join the FinTech West community and get in touch.